Jason Eppink ([info]jasoneppink) wrote,
@ 2008-01-13 11:31:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
We Pranked Improv Everywhere
No Pants was funny (really funny!) before it became a media circus and a parade. Now it's just a strange way for people to form impromptu, oddly serious social groups around an act of silliness, and for the herds of amateur photographers to continue their quest to document every single moment in existence, ever. I mean, it's still funny, but come on, we can do better. So when No Pants 2K8 was announced by email last month, Jen suggested we make it better and I immediately agreed to join her. As the press push continued, No Pants was mentioned on Going.com, Gothamist, and even on The Today Show. The event was becoming less improvisational, and our response was becoming more urgent! Jen corralled our most daring friends and formed Pro Pants 2K8.

We Pranked No Pants 2K8


We decided I would dress up as a preacher and share the good news about Pants to those who had not accepted Pants into their lives, while the rest of the group would hand out pamphlets and stickers and shout "amen" and "hallelujah". Here is the pamphlet Hari, Jenna, and I wrote up:

Pro Pants 2K8 Pantphlet Page 1 Pro Pants 2K8 Pantphlet Page 2
On the afternoon of No Pants 2K8, so many participants showed up that they were split into three groups and directed to ride three different subway lines. We followed our hearts and decided the group heading to the 6 train was most in need of hearing about how Pants could change their lives. We all piled on, and after a few stops, the car was filling up with bare legs, but it was also filling up with people. Indeed, by Union Square, the train was so crowded that we could hardly move around. Really, it was hard to even see that a lot of people were pants-less. We preached and passed out pamphlets on two cars, but sensed such humorlessness - even a bit of animosity - from the No Pants participants, that we decided to bail early.

So we rushed to the meet-up point in Union Square where about 900 pants-less heathens were waiting to be converted. I grabbed a stack of pamphlets and started passing them out, saying "Have you heard the good news?" A crowd formed around me and I shared my testimonial about how I had been lonely and unemployed when I did not have Pants in my life. And I preached that it was a cold, harsh world and that Pants were the only thing that could protect and comfort you in your greatest times of need.

I was really into my character, so I don't remember a lot at this point, but I do remember people chanting "Take them off!" and trying to escape the crowd, being pushed back in, and then someone grabbing me from behind and someone else ripping my pants off of me.

And while I played it off fine at the time, in retrospect, I'm actually pretty creeped out that people took it that far. Sure I could have broken character and told them to stop, sure I was asking for it in some sense, but really, no I wasn't. That's sexual assault.

A few of the pants-less played along and had great fun trying to argue the merits of pants with me. We even converted a new disciple - Brother Mike - who helped us preach the good news for the rest of the night. And throughout the evening, several participants came up and thanked us for adding to the event. One guy even wanted to know if we were another prank group and how he could sign up.

But most of the participants I engaged with were, it seemed, actually threatened on some level! They were taking their characters so seriously that they had formed allegiances they felt the need to vigorously defend. I am still trying to understand exactly what happened because I did not expect the level of negativity we encountered. (A little later we were booed out of a bar that happened to be where all the 21+ pants-less had congregated.)

I was mainly worried about how Charlie would regard our stunt. Would he be flattered that we took the time and energy to add something to his event, or would he see us as wresting away control? When we spoke afterwards, I don't think he was terribly pleased, but I also think he found it sort of funny. Beforehand, Charlie had admitted No Pants was more of a parade than a prank these days, so that assuaged most of my fear. Because, come on, I am not a dude who spoils your fun. I am a dude who tries to make things better.

Overall, Pro Pants 2K8 was a great success! We had a lot of fun, and I'm pleased to announce that a majority of those to whom we passed out pamphlets had accepted pants into their lives by the end of the night! Hallelujah!

With such a pervasive camera presence, photos of us were sure to surface on Flickr. Here are a few!

me preaching on the train
Hari and Jenna passing out pamphlets on the train
Jen on the platform amongst the pantsless hordes
me preaching at Union Square, surrounded by the crowd
Jen looking a little creeped out by the "Take Them Off!" chanters
Kristen and Jenna passing out pamphlets and stickers
Keith and Jen engaging with the pantsless
Jen and Hari fielding compliments, I would imagine



(Post a new comment)


[info]schoolhouserock
2008-01-13 05:24 pm UTC (link)
oh wow. you're right, that is sexual assault. i'd like to say i'm certain that if you were a woman it wouldn't have happened, but really i'm not sure. and that's frightening.

do you think it's because you were so into your character that they thought you were seriously a christian dude averse to pantslessness? and they hated you for it because they thought you were just a conservative asshole trying to put the kibosh on their fun? or was it more some kind of weird improv power issue, Their Joke vs. Our Joke?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]schoolhouserock
2008-01-13 05:27 pm UTC (link)
ok, already realizing that those first two questions were dumb. but i guess i'm curious about whether you think that was at all possible.

also: you get any mail to the acceptpants gmail account yet?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]jasoneppink
2008-01-13 08:22 pm UTC (link)
What difference does it make if the depantsed person is male or female?

I heard from people afterwards that when I first started my spiel on the train, they thought I was for real. And then I started talking about pants and they got the a joke. Those were deliciously awkward moments, in retrospect.

But no, I'm positive no one thought I was actually preaching against pantslessness. There were a couple people, though, who I think were offended by the religious tone because they were young Christians? Which makes sense, because these types of events tend to attract that crowd.

No emails yet, but my fingers are crossed!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]schoolhouserock
2008-01-13 08:50 pm UTC (link)
because when a dude is disrobed to his skivvies it's like "haha! guy with no pants on!" but when a chick is it's like "let's fuck that thing!" the energy would have been much different, in a bad way.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]jasoneppink
2008-01-13 09:28 pm UTC (link)
So you're saying it's more okay for this to happen to a man than to a woman? If so, call me a feminist, but I have to disagree. It doesn't matter what the perceived "vibe" is - however one might qualify it - unless that vibe is acted upon.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]schoolhouserock
2008-01-13 11:27 pm UTC (link)
Nope, not more ok at all. Just a little less scary.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]nihilicious
2008-01-14 05:20 pm UTC (link)
I think "okay" is overstating it. But I think it's different when it happens to a man from when it happens to a woman. It's not anti-feminist to acknowledge that a man's vulnerability is different from a woman's. Stuff that victimizes women--teasing and harassment, sexual objectification, even mild forms of violence--isn't as serious when it victimizes men. It doesn't come with the force of the same cultural/historical baggage behind it.

Maybe it's illustrative that your response to the situation was to process it intellectually, and wonder aloud whether it crossed the line. You had the luxury of only being "creeped out," and only "in retrospect". I wonder if a woman would have had the same response?

This is not really a statement about "ok"/"not ok". It's not ok to harm others, if that's what happened. But harm exists on a scale, and that scale is determined by context. This is more a statement about context.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Oh Kevin, you're so level-headed.
[info]jasoneppink
2008-01-14 07:58 pm UTC (link)
But, we can't assume my response was how every man would have responded, nor that the response of one woman would have spoken for all women.

You're right though, it's the cultural/historical baggage that defines the harm here, (if that's what you're saying) and I guess I've trained myself to ignore that baggage because I feel like acknowledging the baggage perpetuates it (the same way I feel color-blindness is the best solution, on most levels, to racism).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Oh Kevin, you're so level-headed.
[info]yablonovyy
2008-01-15 12:12 am UTC (link)
It's probably just assault, not sexual assault, unless they were actually getting into your business, as it were. For purposes of what you're talking about, calling it "sexual" doesn't make what they did more or less unlawful, and introduces an element of gender which isn't particularly useful to thinking about how you were hurt. Being assaulted is harm enough, thank you!

As you note, consent is the most common defense to assault, and tends to hold especially true in large context-rich settings. For instance, most totally legal activities on the football field would be assault on the street. This would be the mob's best defense: that the big crowd, and all the role-playing, created an environment like a football field, with different rules than conventional society.

Anyway. Law can be a pretty clumsy language for expressing things that are totally obvious. And at the end of the day, the totally obvious thing here is that the people who took off your pants were seriously uncool, and they should know better.

Thanks for keeping the world spontaneous, even if it means some pretty creepy annoyances for you in the process!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]jasoneppink
2008-01-15 01:41 am UTC (link)
No business was gotten into, luckily.

Yeah, the line is so blurry right here regarding consent, which is why I'm having a hard time deciding how I feel about it. We were all acting, but there was no pre-established rapport which either excluded or included forceful pants removal as part of the guidelines of play. I mean, in most contexts that's clearly excluded, but in the context of theatre, it's quite possibly included.

Certainly it was uncool, but in the end, there was no harm done, so whatever. All is forgiven.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]melissadowell
2008-01-13 10:12 pm UTC (link)
Man, that's crazy... and kind of sad that it went down that way. I hate the trend that where there's a big crowd, people seem to lose their sanity.

And sexual harassment indeed. I know that there's been sort of a backlash with "you can't do this to a woman, but it's ok to do it to a man" in feminism over the years, which entirely defeats the purpose of it.

I would write more, but my friend has arrived with milk. We are making pancakes. I want to throw a pancake party at some point.

PS: where have you been hiding? I miss you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jasoneppink
2008-01-15 12:42 am UTC (link)
Pancake party!

Aw man, you know what? I just don't know what is going on with you guys anymore! I'm not sure how it happened, but I totally fell out of the loop. Bring me back into the loop!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]melissadowell
2008-01-15 01:02 am UTC (link)
heh, I don't even have a loop! I just stay at home to drink and folks show up. I need to actually start getting more and JOINING loops.

I've also lost my phone like, twice, and I'm pretty sure I no longer have your number.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]melissadowell
2008-01-15 02:15 am UTC (link)
danke, I do indeed have email alerts.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

At long last
(Anonymous)
2008-01-14 01:02 am UTC (link)
I am truly and deeply pleased to see that you have finally come around to the ways of the pantsed, Jason. For years, with your beard, long hair, sandals, and various states of undress, I had feared for your eternal legs. To see such a remarkable turnaround...I'm almost in tears.

Be vigilant, my young convert. The fire for pants burns in you strongly, but even as the passion subsides, remember in your heart and mind that the way of the pants is the only true path. Be wary of the temptations of shorts, boxers, and the horrendously sinful banana hammocks. Some may say "kilts are like pants, Scottish pants!" But the Scots eat boiled sheep stomach. What would you want to have in common with these pagans?

Pants are good all the time, and all the time pants are good.
-Chris Graue

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: At long last
[info]jasoneppink
2008-01-15 01:47 am UTC (link)
Very nice, Brother Chris. There is still much work to do. I hope you can join me next year!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]miketheman
2008-01-14 01:56 am UTC (link)
Brother Mike here - found you here.
I've sent an email to y'all, and also just finished my own write-up, enjoy.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jasoneppink
2008-01-14 07:53 pm UTC (link)
Brother Mike, it's good to hear from you! Thanks for spreading the good news with us, and on your blog. Let your light shine, my friend!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Heathen
(Anonymous)
2008-01-14 02:40 am UTC (link)
I laid that full nelson that you could not escape from on you. You heathen.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Heathen
[info]jasoneppink
2008-01-14 07:59 pm UTC (link)
But I forgave you, and you in the end you re-panted! Hallelujah!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]agentkimchee
2008-01-14 06:23 am UTC (link)
The picture of the floating pants in front of the parting clouds is, by far, my favorite. I'm a convert.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jasoneppink
2008-01-15 02:26 am UTC (link)
Hallelujah! And to think the Church split over icons!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2008-01-14 05:33 pm UTC (link)
I wasn't on your train, but would have thought it was hilarious. I had read in other people's reports about the pants preacher, but didn't have a clue until I stumbled here from a blog from a report on IE's site. I love it, great job. My group (R train) & group was small, & the car not very crowded, so I was disappointed not to have the kind of fun that I expected, & never was asked why I wasn't wearing pants. The experience was fun, but I'm sad that it's so huge & so publicized. I was @ Union Square for awhile afterward, & I thought the mob scene was pretty scary, maybe because I'm female, & old enough(44) to know a potentially bad situation when I see it. I stayed on the edges of the crowd, because it just seemed like it could get out of hand, everyone was on such a high. I kept hearing the chanting & roars signaling that someone had been convinced to(or forcibly had them in your case) remove their pants, which frankly creeped me out. When a mob mentality sets in, all rational thought goes out the window.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jasoneppink
2008-01-15 01:28 am UTC (link)
Thanks! Glad you liked our response, and sorry you got the same feeling from the mob as we did (though, luckily without the man-handling). Hopefully see ya next year!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]filmerp
2008-02-06 01:51 am UTC (link)
Great meta-prank, Jason! Though I was a bit disappointed to see that you have not written about, and thus assume that you were not part of, making time stop at Grand Central Station.

P.S. You ever get the footage from the 557 project?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jasoneppink
2008-02-07 05:29 pm UTC (link)
Au contraire! Just hadn't gotten around to writing about it. Man, the internet went crazy for that one.

Yeah, I have the footage! I have a pretty good edit; now I am working on sound.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…